Owning an apartment complex is a long-term investment built on predictable income streams, stable occupancy, and well-managed operating expenses. When the government steps in and takes some or all of that property—through eminent domain—it doesn’t just affect the dirt under your buildings. It can disrupt rental income, force relocation of tenants, interfere with financing, and diminish the long-term value of the project. And too often, the government’s first offer completely ignores the unique economics of apartment properties.
This guide walks apartment complex owners through the key strategies—drawn from Florida law and the principles laid out in Florida Eminent Domain Practice and Procedure—to ensure you capture every dollar you’re entitled to.
-p-2000.png)
.svg)
When an apartment complex is taken, the government focuses on one thing: its appraised value of the land and improvements. But income-producing properties—especially multifamily—require a completely different analysis.
Florida law recognizes several categories of recoverable damages that go far beyond simple “value of the land”:
For a total taking, the measure is the property’s fair market value—but not just based on comparable sales. Apartment complexes often require:
• Income capitalization analysis (because rent rolls, NOIs, cap rates, and occupancy trends drive value)
• Replacement cost and depreciation analyses
• Highest and best use studies
Many owners receive low offers because the condemning authority uses comparable sales from inferior multifamily properties or fails to adjust appropriately for cap rate compression in desirable markets.
Most apartment complex takings are partial—for example:
• roadway widening
• utility easements
• drainage improvements
• right-of-way acquisitions
A partial taking often cuts into landscaping buffers, parking, ingress/egress, frontage, or usable land. When this happens, Florida law allows recovery for the reduction in value to the remaining property.
Common severance impacts for apartment complexes include:
• Loss of parking leading to reduced occupancy or lower rents
• Increased noise or traffic directly affecting tenant satisfaction
• Loss of visibility or curb appeal
• Increased flooding or drainage issues
• Setback violations triggered by the loss of land
Apartments are income-driven assets. Anything that affects rent, operating costs, or future redevelopment potential can dramatically weaken property value—and must be captured in the severance analysis.
Sometimes the damage caused by the taking can be mitigated. If restoring functionality is cheaper than absorbing the permanent loss, you are entitled to the reasonable cost of those cures.
Typical cures for apartment complexes include:
• Reconfiguring driveways or entrances
• Rebuilding parking spaces elsewhere on site
• Constructing new walls or screening
• Modifying drainage systems
• Re-designing site circulation for tenant safety
Cost-to-cure must be realistic, supported by engineering, and thoroughly documented—not merely conceptual.
Apartment complexes do not typically qualify for business-damage claims because rental real estate is considered an investment activity rather than an operating “business” under Florida Statute §73.071(3)(b).
However, if your apartment complex also includes:
• ground-floor retail,
• on-site management operations, or
• ancillary revenue-producing activities
there may be limited circumstances where a business component is affected. This must be analyzed carefully.
Major public projects often disrupt tenants for months or years. If the government’s activities:
• block access,
• reduce parking,
• create noise/dust, or
• materially interfere with safe operation of the complex,
those impacts may justify additional compensation.
Many owners accept the inconvenience as “part of the process,” but the law often allows compensation when the impacts exceed what the general public experiences.
The government almost always starts with a “cost-controlled” appraisal designed to minimize payouts. Owners should have:
• their own appraiser,
• a civil engineer, and
• if needed, a traffic or parking expert
engaged early.
These experts look at the property’s true income performance—not a generic model.
For income-producing properties, small changes in NOI create large changes in value. Your valuation team should analyze:
• rent rolls
• historical occupancy
• concessions
• operating expenses
• impact of lost parking or access
• future rent trends
A minor access-related vacancy increase can translate into hundreds of thousands—or millions—of dollars in value loss.
Many apartment complexes have redevelopment potential for:
• denser multifamily
• mixed-use
• student housing
• senior living
If the property’s highest and best use is redevelopment, the taking may destroy that potential. Florida law allows compensation for that loss.
Easements and right-of-way acquisitions frequently create hidden problems:
• new water flow onto the property
• increased flooding
• forced retention redesign
• slope and grading issues
A strong engineering analysis can uncover significant severance impacts the government ignores.
They often understate what it actually costs to fix the problems. You are entitled to reasonable, necessary, and functional cures—not the cheapest patch the agency proposes.
Florida law is crystal clear: In eminent domain cases, the government—not the property owner—must pay the owner’s attorney’s fees and costs.
This is mandated by Florida Statute §73.092 and the Florida Constitution’s requirement for “full compensation.”
Here’s what that means for you:
• You do not pay me out-of-pocket.
• My fees are paid separately by the condemning authority.
• You keep 100% of the compensation I recover for the property value, severance damages, and cost-to-cure damages.
If the case involves a true, qualifying business-damage claim (rare for apartment complexes), I handle that on a contingency percentage only for the business-damage component, and only if it increases your total recovery.
There is absolutely no financial downside to hiring me.
.svg)